Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLES  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 48-57
Periorbital rejuvenation: A study on the use of dermal threads as monotherapy, with a review of literature


1 Mehektagul Dermaclinic, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Dermatology, Army College of Medical Sciences & Base Hospital, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication17-May-2022
 

   Abstract 

The periorbital region, a major impressionable area holds a special place in aging of the face. It reflects chronological aging which are reflected not only as structural changes but also emotive expressions of sadness and tiredness. Dermal threads have been used in combination with other aesthetic procedures, however their use as monotherapy especially in periorbital region needs evaluation. Aim: To evaluate the improvement in wrinkling and skin texture in the infero-lateral periorbital region with monofilament dermal threads. Settings and Design: A prospective observational study in a tertiary hospital was conducted between January 2019 and February 2020 after institutional ethical clearance and patient consent. Materials and Methods: 25 adults between 40 and 65 years of age reporting for infero-lateral periorbital rejuvenation and opting for dermal threads, with no history of aesthetic treatment in this region for the past three months were included after their informed consent. 10 monofilament dermal threads (5 each in lateral and infraorbital) in either periorbital region were inserted. Cases were assessed with Lemperle’s wrinkle scale and visual analog scale (VAS) and photographic record maintained before procedure and after 16 weeks of procedure. Change in wrinkle grade was analysed using paired t-test and VAS was used to assess patient’s perception of the result. Results: 25 cases were included in the study, 21 completed the follow-up and 4 were lost to follow up. The mean preprocedure wrinkle score was 2.29 and postprocedure mean scores were 1. This finding was statistically significant. 16 cases were satisfied with their textural improvement (VAS >+2) while 4 reported mild improvement (VAS 2+) and 1 reported no improvement. Side effects observed were bruising in two cases and thread displacement in one case within 24 hours. Conclusions: Polydioxanone monothreads offer an alternative aesthetic procedure for periorbital rejuvenation.

Keywords: Periorbital rejuvenation, periorbital wrinkles, polydioxanone thread

How to cite this article:
Arora G, Arora S. Periorbital rejuvenation: A study on the use of dermal threads as monotherapy, with a review of literature. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2022;15:48-57

How to cite this URL:
Arora G, Arora S. Periorbital rejuvenation: A study on the use of dermal threads as monotherapy, with a review of literature. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 5];15:48-57. Available from: https://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2022/15/1/48/345337





   Introduction Top


The periorbital region holds a special place in aging of the face. It is widely considered as the impressionable region of the face. It is one of the first areas to undergo aging. Aging of this area also reflects the emotional attributes of a person, such as tiredness and sadness. A youthful periorbital region is characterized by a well-defined brow with an appropriate height and a generally pleasant arch defined by gender and personal preferences, smooth and even toned periorbital skin of “good quality,” and a gentle transition to the malar area.[1] Aging, hence, could affect any of these components, resulting in an aged look [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Profile of periorbital region at younger age (left) and aging changes (right) (original drawing)

Click here to view


Periorbital rejuvenation is, thus, an important component of aesthetic practice and multiple treatment options have been proposed, including surgical correction, hyaluronic acid fillers, botulinum toxin, chemical peels, lasers, mesotherapy, topical preparations, and nutritional supplements alone or in various combinations. Dermal threads have been used for rejuvenation owing to their unique ability to induce collagen remodeling and at the same time induce skin surface changes.[2]

We evaluated 21 cases treated with dermal threads as monotherapy for infero-lateral periorbital rejuvenation to assess their outcomes.


   Subjects and Methods Top


Patients between 40 and 65 years of age, reporting to a dermatology center between January 2019 and February 2020 for infero-lateral periorbital rejuvenation and opting for dermal threads treatment, were evaluated after the institute ethical committee clearance and patient consent. Those who had received any other cosmetic procedure for periorbital rejuvenation in the past three months, history of keloidal or bleeding tendencies, pregnant and lactating patients, active infection in this region, unrealistic expectations, and prior allergy to prilocaine/ lidocaine/ material of suture were excluded. All cases were photographed preprocedure and at 16-weeks postprocedure with standard lighting and patient position to ensure uniformity in assessment. They were assessed for periorbital wrinkling severity by using the Lemperle’s scale [Figure 2] (Grade 0: no wrinkles, 1: just perceptible wrinkle, 2: shallow wrinkle, 3: moderately deep wrinkle, 4: deep wrinkle with well-defined edges, and 5: very deep wrinkle with redundant fold),[3] and for the extent of periorbital wrinkling Tamura and Odo classification [Figure 3] was used.[4]
Figure 2: Lemperle’s wrinkle scale for periorbital region (Grade 0: no wrinkles, 1: just perceptible wrinkle, 2: shallow wrinkle, 3: moderately deep wrinkle, 4: deep wrinkle with well-defined edges, and 5: very deep wrinkle with redundant fold) (original drawing)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Tamura and Odo classification of periorbital wrinkles (Type I: lateral periorbital wrinkle extending from the brow to the zygomatic arch; Type II: wrinkles lateral to the external canthus of the eye, extending from the line of the external canthus of the eye to the zygomatic arch with no wrinkles in the superior lateral region; Type III: wrinkles in the line of the external canthus only; presence of lower eyelid wrinkles B1: lateral; B2: medial and B3: internal canthal wrinkles) (original drawing)

Click here to view


Each side was treated with 10 polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament threads (Alfa Aqulift 29G, 25 mm, Yurim Medical, South Korea) in a single session under aseptic precautions with topical anesthesia by using a eutectic mixture of prilocaine and lidocaine 1 h before insertion.

The threads were inserted by using a “pinch and insert method” practised by authors, wherein the skin was pinched at the site of insertion and a needle was inserted. This allowed an easy insertion and enabled the correct plane of delivery. The needles were either inserted singly or more together (depending on the space available to prevent needle crowding) along vectors and removed one after the other with a gentle rotation to ensure thread retention. Five threads were inserted in the infraorbital and five in the lateral periorbital region on either side in the subdermal plane along vectors, as depicted in [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Representational image of thread insertion in the periorbital region with vectors for infraorbital (above) and lateral periorbital (below) region. (original drawing)

Click here to view


Postprocedure they were advised ice pack application and placed on capsule amoxicillin (625 mg) with clavulanic acid (125 mg) three times a day for five days. Patients were advised to abstain from smoking, vigorous exercises for a week, avoid any face massage for two weeks, and placed on follow-up after one week and every four weeks postprocedure.

The results were assessed by using the score obtained preprocedure and at 16 weeks after the procedure by using the score above and by Visual Assessment Scale (VAS) by patients (4+, >75% improvement; 3+, 50%–75% improvement; 2+, 25%–50% improvement; 1+, 0%–25% improvement; and no response) taking into account textural changes, wrinkle improvement, and skin pigmentation [Figure 5] and [Figure 6]. Wrinkle-grade changes were evaluated preprocedure and compared at 16 weeks by using the paired t-test to assess for statistical significance, and VAS was recorded to assess patient satisfaction.
Figure 5: Preprocedure (left) and postprocedure (right) A: improvement in wrinkles and periocular pigmentation; B and C: improvement in wrinkles and periocular rejuvenation

Click here to view
Figure 6: Preprocedure (left) and postprocedure (right) A: improvement in scar and wrinkles; B: poor response to treatment; C: improvement in wrinkles and rejuvenation

Click here to view



   Results Top


Overall, 25 patients were evaluated and initiated in the study between January 2019 and February 2020. However, 21 (19 females and two males) could be followed up. At the end of 16 weeks, four cases were lost to follow-up, one each after two and three weeks and two after eight weeks. All patients were between 40 and 65 years of age. All cases reported for improvement in skin texture, periorbital wrinkling and three cases also desired improvement of “under eye bags.” The mean preprocedure wrinkle score was 2.29, and postprocedure mean score was 1. The finding was statistically significant (P < 0.0001).

Overall, 16 cases were satisfied with their textural improvement (VAS >+2), four reported mild improvement (VAS 2+), and one reported no improvement [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of cases and their assessment pre- and postprocedure

Click here to view


Erythema and periorbital puffiness as sequelae were seen in four cases. Side effects observed were bruising in two cases, which resolved over the next seven days, thread displacement in one case within 24 h after inadvertent rubbing of the periorbital region [Figure 7]. The thread was removed, and an additional thread was placed in the infraorbital region.
Figure 7: Sequelae and complications: A: early erythema and edema; B: early linear ecchymosis along thread insertion; C: displaced thread (red arrow)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The periorbital region is the presenting region of the face. The complex process of facial aging is best represented in this region. From the underlying bony structure to the various layers of the soft tissue, aging occurs at all anatomical levels. The anatomical understanding of this region is, hence, a must to understand its aging process.

The thin eyelid skin does not contain subcutaneous fat, is less than 1 mm thick, and transitions to the skin of the periorbital region, the brow region superiorly, and the malar area inferiorly. This region has three main fat pads superiorly, the preseptal lying over the orbital septum, the preaponeurotic behind the orbital septum and over the levator aponeurosis, and the galeal located under the brow skin. Inferiorly the three fat pads, medial, central, and lateral lie over the capsulopaplebral fascia and under the orbital septum [Figure 8]. A thin fibrous septum arising from the periosteum of the orbit forms the orbital septum in the inferior and superior region lying below the sphincteric muscle of the eye; the orbicularis oculi, which, in turn, consists of its pretarsal, preseptal, and orbital parts [Figure 8].[1],[5],[6],[7]
Figure 8: Periorbital fat pads (above) and transverse section through layers of periorbital region (below) (original drawing)

Click here to view


Aging results in resorption of the bone, fat atrophy, and ligamental and muscular laxity with a shift of action from levators to depressors. The skin is affected by this chronological aging, resulting in a loss of elasticity and hydration as well as the exposome, which cause photoaging and a gravity-dependent tissue sag.[8],[9]

For aging changes and its assessment, the periorbital region is divided into three parts [Figure 9].[6] In zone 1, with age, the eyebrows turn flatter in shape and depress in height appearing to lie at or below the prominent supraorbital rims due to resorption of periorbital frontal and zygomatic bones, fat atrophy, hyperactivity of its depressors as compared with younger brows with their gentle curved arch in females and flatter but higher brows in males; zone 2 changes are the most striking. Baggy lower eyelids have a complex etiopathogenesis. Skin laxity of the lower lid resulting from elastin and collagen degeneration, fluid retention, fat compartment sag by weakening orbicularis muscle, and orbital septum with retroorbital and infraorbital fat pseudo-herniation and orbital resorption result in puffy under eyes. In addition to what has been cited earlier, thinning of the skin with increased visibility of the underlying vascular network and orbicularis oculi, excessive dermal melanogenesis of multifactorial etiology such as melasma, dermal melanocytosis, hemosiderin deposition, and orbital hollowing leading to infraorbital shadowing all result in infraorbital dark circles.[10],[11] Ligamental tethering along with infraorbital fat sag heightens the transition medial eyelid to the maxilla, forming the tear trough and from the lateral lower eyelid to the zygoma forming the palpebro-malar groove [Figure 1].[7] Zone 3 merges with the midface.
Figure 9: Periorbital zones (original drawing)

Click here to view


Nonsurgical treatments for periorbital rejuvenation include topical therapies in the form of sunscreens, retinoids, peptides, antioxidants, chemical peels, laser and mechanical resurfacing, botulinum toxin, nonablative and microneedle radio frequency devices and dermal fillers, boosters, carboxytherapy, and platelet-rich plasma.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] Dermal threads are increasingly being used for lift and rejuvenation, especially on the face, as they stimulate fibroblasts, induce collagenization, and neo-angiogenesis, thus improving the skin texture, laxity, and wrinkles.[2],[21],[22] They can, thus, be used in areas that are classically the no-go areas for other procedures such as the infraorbital for botulinum toxin in infraorbital wrinkling. To the best of our knowledge, there is no reported literature on these.

One type of monofilament threads was used in all our cases, hence ensuring uniform assessment of results and clinical outcome.[23] Literature reports are varied, especially for anchored or barbed threads as the final outcome would be dependant in these cases on the thread’s tensile strength, surgeon techniques, and vectors used. The PDO threads induce tissue changes and are generally free from these mechanical variables.[24]

In our cases, those with mild to moderate wrinkling and textural changes reported higher degree of satisfaction (VAS > 2+), however those with severe wrinkling, and “under eye bags” reported lower satisfaction and were also observed to have responded poorly to the procedure [Figure 5] and [Figure 6]. The complex multifactorial etiology of under eye puffiness emphasizes that no one single procedure may benefit these cases and each individual must be assessed and treated accordingly. Improvement in skin color with improvement in “dark circles” could possibly be explained by collagen induction and the subsequent increase in skin thickness, resulting in altered optical properties of the erstwhile thinner skin here.

Side effects reported after monothreads insertion are usually edema, swelling, and pain.[25],[26] Four of our cases had erythema and transient swelling, which lasted a few hours to the next 24 h and those subsided without intervention. Two of our cases had bruising, which subsided over the next 10 days. They were advised topical vitamin K cream twice a day for seven days. The periorbital area is vascular rich and especially at risk of postoperative ecchymoses and hematomas. Thinner 29-gauge needles used in the procedure possibly prevented a more common occurrence of this complication. One patient had inadvertently rubbed her eye a few hours after the procedure, resulting in the displacement of a single thread that was removed the next day by a needle stab incision. Hence, there was a need for care of the treated area for a week postprocedure to prevent thread displacement. Since the threads were placed subdermally, their migration to deeper layers beyond this plane was not possible and were, hence, considered safe. Frequent inadvertent blinking on account of the active orbicularis oculi or inadvertent rubbing, as in our case, may cause thread migration in the same plane. This, nevertheless, emphasizes the need for a trained dermatologist/ aesthetic physician to practice this procedure to ensure the correct delivery of the thread.

Our study was limited by a smaller size, and larger studies may be needed to corroborate the results.


   Conclusion Top


The PDO threads offer an important additional approach to rejuvenation, especially in the periorbital region, with minimal adverse effects encountered in other aesthetic procedures and surgery.[27],[28] They may be combined with other modalities such as botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, and skin boosters to further enhance their rejuvenating potential. As with other aesthetic procedures, repeated sessions may be needed to maintain their effect. Those with severe wrinkling may benefit with repeated sessions. The use of longer lasting materials such as polycaprolactone and microlifting using PDO threads with exosomes could enhance the effectiveness of this procedure.[29],[30]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/ have given his/ her/ their consent for his/ her/ their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Robertsiii TT, Yokoo K. Continuing medical education examination—facial aesthetic surgery in pursuit of optimal periorbital rejuvenation: Laser resurfacing with or without blepharoplasty and brow lift. Aesthet Surg J 1998;18:321-32.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Arora G, Arora S. Neck rejuvenation with thread lift. J Cutan Aesthetic Surg 2019;12:196.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1735-50; discussion 1751-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tamura BM, Odo MY. Classification of periorbital wrinkles and treat- ment with Botulinum Toxin Type A. Surg Cosmet Dermato 2011;3:129-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Love LP, Farrior EH. Periocular Anatomy and Aging. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 2010;18:411-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ranneva E, Siquier G, Liplavk O. New medical approach for rejuvenation of the periorbital area. Clin Med Investig2016;1:27-30.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kashkouli MB, Abdolalizadeh P, Abolfathzadeh N, Sianati H, Sharepour M, Hadi Y. Periorbital facial rejuvenation; applied anatomy and pre-operative assessment. J Curr Ophthalmol 2017;29:154-68.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
De Biasio F, Miotti G, Zingaretti N, Castriotta L, Parodi PC. Study on the aging dynamics of the periorbital region: From observation to knowledge of physiopathology. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;35:333-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mally P, Czyz CN, Wulc AE. The role of gravity in periorbital and midfacial aging. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34:809-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vrcek I, Ozgur O, Nakra T. Infraorbital dark circles: A review of the pathogenesis, evaluation and treatment. J Cutan Aesthetic Surg 2016;9:65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Huang Y-L, Chang S-L, Ma L, Lee M-C, Hu S. Clinical analysis and classification of dark eye circle. Int J Dermatol 2014;53: 164-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Manaloto RMP, Alster TS. Periorbital rejuvenation: A review of dermatologic treatments. Dermatol Surg 1999;25:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sarkar R, Ranjan R, Garg S, Garg VK, Sonthalia S, Bansal S. Periorbital hyperpigmentation: A comprehensive review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2016;9:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Edween JA. Periorbital chemical peels. In: Myint SA, editor. Nonsurgical Peri-orbital Rejuvenation. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2014 [cited 2020 Oct 16]. pp. 25-38. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-8388-5_3  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ahmed NA, Mohammed SS, Fatani MI. Treatment of periorbital dark circles: Comparative study of carboxy therapy vs chemical peeling vs mesotherapy. J Cosmet Dermatol 2019;18:169-75.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ypiranga S, Fonseca R. Hyaluronic acid filler for skin booster on the face. In: Issa MCA, Tamura B, editors. Daily Routine in Cosmetic Dermatology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 16]. pp. 1-10. Clinical Approaches and Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-20253-2_23-1  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Guida S, Nisticò SP, Farnetani F, Del Duca E, De Carvalho N, Persechino F, et al. Resurfacing with ablation of periorbital skin technique: Indications, efficacy, safety, and 3D assessment from a pilot study. Photomed Laser Surg 2018;36:541-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Singh A, Yadav S. Microneedling: Advances and widening horizons. Indian Dermatol Online J 2016;7:244.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Kassir M, Kroumpouzos G, Puja P, Katsambas A, Galadari H, Lotti T, et al. Update in minimally invasive periorbital rejuvenation with a focus on platelet-rich plasma: A narrative review. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020;19:1057-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Arora G, Arora S. Platelet Rich Plasma – where do we stand today? A critical narrative review and analysis. Dermatol Ther 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 30]; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dth.14343  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Abraham RF, DeFatta RJ, Williams EF. Thread-lift for facial rejuvenation: assessment of long-term results. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009 [cited 2019 Dec 7];11. Available from: http://archfaci.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archfacial.2009.10  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Arora G, Arora S. Thread lift in breast ptosis. J Cutan Aesthetic Surg 2017;10:228.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Aitzetmueller MM, Centeno Cerdas C, Nessbach P, Foehr P, Brett E, Thor D, et al. Polydioxanone threads for facial rejuvenation: Analysis of quality variation in the market. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144:1002e-9e.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gülbitti HA, Colebunders B, Pirayesh A, Bertossi D, van der Lei B. Thread-lift sutures: Still in the lift? A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:341e-7e.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Arora G, Arora S. A study of complications of aesthetic thread lift: A review of 250 cases. [Internet] 2018. Available from: http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.32103.88489 [accessed 2020 Oct 19].  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ahn SK, Choi HJ. Complication after PDO threads lift. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e467-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kaynak-Hekimhan P. Noncosmetic periocular therapeutic applications of botulinum toxin. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010;17:113.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
28.
Abduljabbar MH, Basendwh MA. Complications of hyaluronic acid fillers and their managements. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 2016;20:100-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Tiryaki KT, Aksungur E, Grotting JC. Micro-shuttle lifting of the neck: A percutaneous loop suspension method using a novel double-ended needle. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36:629-38.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Irvine Duncan D. Combining PDO threads with exosomes for microlifting. In: Tang Y-B, editor. Cosmetic Surgery [Internet]. IntechOpen; 2021 [cited 2020 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/cosmetic-surgery/combining-pdo-threads-with-exosomes-for-microlifting [accessed 2020 Oct 19].  Back to cited text no. 30
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sandeep Arora
Department of Dermatology, Army College of Medical Sciences & Base Hospital, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_221_20

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed483    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded106    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal