Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
SHORT COMMUNICATION  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 119-122
Keystone flap for postburn finger flexion contracture release


Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication27-Mar-2021
 

   Abstract 

Flexion contracture of finger is a major cause of disability in postburn patients. Various methods have been described to cover the resultant defect after surgical release of finger flexion contracture. Local flaps are used when there is sufficient tissue available on lateral sides of the finger to recruit into the defect. Keystone flap can be designed on volar aspect of finger to cover the post contracture release defect. Use of local flap reduces need of skin graft and donor site morbidity. Here we discuss a case of postburn finger flexion contracture release using type-3 keystone flap. Postoperative results are satisfactory. Various pros and cons of the technique are discussed. Keystone flap is a new addition to the armamentarium of plastic surgeons for release of postburn flexion contracture of fingers.

Keywords: Finger flexion contracture, keystone flap, postburn contracture

How to cite this article:
Gupta S, Chittoria RK, Chavan V, Aggarwal A, Reddy CL, Mohan PB, Shijina K, Pathan I. Keystone flap for postburn finger flexion contracture release. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2021;14:119-22

How to cite this URL:
Gupta S, Chittoria RK, Chavan V, Aggarwal A, Reddy CL, Mohan PB, Shijina K, Pathan I. Keystone flap for postburn finger flexion contracture release. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 23];14:119-22. Available from: https://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2021/14/1/119/311843





   Key messages: Top


  1. Keystone flap is a new option for release of postburn flexion contracture of finger.


  2. It reduces skin graft requirement, thus donor site morbidity is low.


  3. Its utility is limited to mild contractures only.



   Introduction Top


Postburn contracture is a major problem in developing countries.[1] Contractures are common sequela of hand burns because it is difficult for the patient to be compliant of physiotherapy and splinting regime. Flexion contracture of fingers is a cause of deformity in postburn patients.[2] Surgical release is the standard treatment for postburn flexion contractures of finger.[3] There are various methods described for coverage of resultant defect after finger contracture release.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] In case the defect is smaller it can be covered with local flaps, borrowing tissue from the adjacent (lateral) areas of finger. Most common flap described is the z-plasty transposition flap. Keystone design flap can be planned for these defects in such a way that it recruits tissue from lateral sides of finger to the defect in central part. We have used type-3 keystone design flap for coverage of defect after release of finger flexion contracture, with good post operative results.


   Case History Top


A 17-year-old, right-hand dominant, school-going girl, came to the plastic surgery department of our hospital with postburn flexion contracture of index, middle, and ring fingers at proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint level. She had a history of accidental flame burn to the right hand 1 year back which healed with secondary intention without splinting. Now patient was admitted for surgical correction of deformity [Figure 1]. While planning the surgery, the expected defect was calculated by comparison from normal hand and it was found that there is tissue deficiency in index and middle fingers and the defect will require tissue from distant site for coverage. However, for ring finger contracture was found to be less severe and there was available tissue on lateral sides of finger to cover the defect. [Table 1] presents the calculated defect size for each finger. Staged reconstruction was planned to correct the deformity. In the first stage, index and middle finger contracture was released and the resultant defect was covered with full thickness skin graft from groin area. Then after 1 week the ring finger contracture was released and a type-3 keystone design flap was planned to cover the defect [Figure 2]. The flap markings were planned preoperatively on normal finger beforehand [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Preoperative image of the postburn flexion contracture of right index, middle, and ring fingers

Click here to view
Table 1: Preoperative measurements of expected defect size after contracture release

Click here to view
Figure 2: Defect of width 1.5 cm after contracture release and internal splinting with Kirschner wire. Type-3 keystone flap is planned of width 0.7 cm on each side

Click here to view
Figure 3: Preoperative planning on normal finger (opposite hand) for contracture release using type-3 keystone flap

Click here to view


Transverse release incision was given at the summit of the contracture. All the scar tissue was released until the finger became straight. The resultant defect was 1.5 cm wide extending up to midaxial line on both sides. For designing type-3 keystone flap the defect was imagined in two halves divided by a transverse line in the center. A curve parallel to the side of the ellipse was drawn proximal and distal to the defect taking width of the flaps same as that of the half defect (0.7 cm). Then tangents were drawn from both ends of the defect and perpendicular lines were made up to the point of intersection with the curve.[1] After marking the flap, skin and subcutaneous tissue were cut leaving the fascia over the pulley intact. Flaps were mobilized to cover the defect and two stay sutures were put. V-Y advancement was gained from both ends of the flaps. Both ends were closed in Y fashion. Two triangles of excessive tissue at the volar margin of the defect were cut and discarded from the flaps. Then the flap inset was given using HEMMing technique (horizontal everting mattress method of suturing).[1] There was a secondary defect at the proximal end of the finger, which was covered with a small full thickness skin graft from the groin area [Figure 4]. Full thickness skin graft of size 1.2 cm × 0.5 cm was required. Bolster dressing was given over the graft and light moist dressing was put on the flaps. External hand splint was applied keeping the PIP joint and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint straight. Hand elevation provided with the sling.
Figure 4: Immediate postoperative image. Note that secondary defect after flap mobilization is covered with full thickness skin graft

Click here to view


Proximal flap had venous congestion during the first week, which got corrected by the second week. Graft was taken well. Sutures and K-wire were removed after 2 weeks. Hand therapy was started after K-wire removal. Pressure garments and silicone sheet were applied to facilitate better scar maturation. [Figure 5] shows a postoperative picture after 4 weeks of surgery.
Figure 5: Postoperative image after 4 weeks of surgery

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The Keystone Design Perforator Island Flap (KDPIF) is a curvilinear shaped trapezoidal design flap. It is named after its similarity with the keystone used to support the arch in roman constructions. Behan[6] has described and classified this flap and also popularized its application in various locations of the body. There are four types of keystone flaps described:[6]

  1. Type 1: Standard flap design, without cutting the deep fascia (suitable for defects up to 2 cm wide).


  2. Type 2A: Standard flap design with deep fascia cut along the flap margins
    • a. Type 2A: Flap inset closes the defect primarily.


    • b. Type 2B: secondary defect created which is covered using split thickness skin graft.


  3. Type 3: Double keystone flaps, designed on either side of the defect


  4. Type 4: Rotational keystone flap.


Keystone flap is essentially two V-Y flaps end to side.[6] For designing a keystone flap, the excision should be parallel to the vessels or the line of perforators in that region.[7] Blood vessels of finger form a ladder pattern. Digital vessels run in longitudinal fashion along the length of the finger and give multiple transverse branches which are interconnected. Based on this there are two designs of keystone flaps possible in the finger [Figure 6]. Vascular supply of keystone flap in the finger comes through the subcutaneous tissue in the base of the flap similar to the volar V-Y advancement flap [Figure 7].
Figure 6: Arterial pattern and possible designs of keystone flap in a finger. A keystone flap should be designed parallel to the vessels or the line of perforators in that region

Click here to view
Figure 7: Cross-section of finger at the level of shaft of proximal phalanx; the figure is showing depth of incision for raising keystone flap

Click here to view


There are various modifications of the keystone design flap described and it has been used in all regions of body from head to toe.[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] We used type-3 keystone flap for reconstruction of defect after release of postburn flexion contracture of the fingers. It is the local tissue rearrangement which recruits tissue from lateral side of the finger similar to a z-plasty [Figure 8].
Figure 8: Keystone flap is similar to two lateral V-Y flaps joined together. It recruits tissue from lateral sides and fills the defect in center

Click here to view


Advantage of doing a flap for finger flexion contracture release is that it utilizes the local tissue and thus it reduces requirement of the skin graft. Donor site morbidity is reduced. Also there is less scar contraction with flap compared to graft and thus chances of recurrence are less with flap. Compared to z-plasty the flap tip necrosis is expected to be less with the keystone flap because entire flap is attached to the base.

Limitation of using keystone flap for finger flexion contracture release is limited advancement. Designing a keystone flap requires availability of the tissue proximal and distal to the contracture site. Also, there should be skin laxity on lateral sides of the finger to provide V-Y advancement to flap from the sides. Thus, utility of this method of reconstruction is limited to mild contractures only. In our case, we were able to close 1.5 cm wide defect with this flap and 0.5 cm wide graft. Thus effective flap mobilization was 1 cm only.

Pin cushioning type edema and venous congestion are described as expected complications of keystone flaps.[6],[7],[8],[9] Proximal flap showed venous congestion in immediate postoperative period in our case. Keystone flap produces more scarring compared to skin graft or z-plasty. In case of finger reconstruction scar hypersensitivity may be a long-term complication of this procedure. Our patient is under follow up for long-term outcomes of the procedure. This is a single case report about use of type-3 keystone flap for finger contracture release. This case report shows that use of keystone flap is suitable for this indication. A large case series is required to study its anatomical and clinical effects.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Schwarz RJ Management of postburn contractures of the upper extremity. J Burn Care Res 2007;28:212-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sabapathy SR, Bajantri B, Bharathi RR Management of post burn hand deformities. Indian J Plast Surg 2010;43:S72-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Grishkevich VM, Grishkevich M Postburn flexion contractures of fingers: Anatomy and treatment with trapeze-flap plasty. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Burns. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. pp. 269-85.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Acikel C, Peker F, Yuksel F, Ulkur E Bilateral side finger transposition flaps in the treatment of chronic postburn flexion contractures of the fingers. Ann Plast Surg 2002;49: 344-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Stekelenburg CM, Marck RE, Tuinebreijer WE, de Vet HC, Ogawa R, van Zuijlen PP A systematic review on burn scar contracture treatment: Searching for evidence. J Burn Care Res 2015;36:e153-61.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Behan FC The keystone design perforator island flap in reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:112-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mohan AT, Rammos CK, Akhavan AA, Martinez J, Wu PS, Moran SL, et al. Evolving concepts of keystone perforator island flaps (KPIF): Principles of perforator anatomy, design modifications, and extended clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1909-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Pelissier P, Santoul M, Pinsolle V, Casoli V, Behan F The keystone design perforator island flap. Part I: Anatomic study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:883-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Pelissier P, Gardet H, Pinsolle V, Santoul M, Behan FC The keystone design perforator island flap. Part II: Clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:888-91.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Moncrieff MD, Thompson JF, Stretch JR Extended experience and modifications in the design and concepts of the keystone design island flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1359-63.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Khouri JS, Egeland BM, Daily SD, Harake MS, Kwon S, Neligan PC, et al. The keystone island flap: Use in large defects of the trunk and extremities in soft-tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127: 1212-21.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gutman MJ, Goldschlager T, Fahardieh RD, Ying D, Xenos C, Danks RA Keystone design perforator island flap for closure of myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 2011;27:1459-63.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Behan F, Sizeland A, Porcedu S, Somia N, Wilson J Keystone island flap: An alternative reconstructive option to free flaps in irradiated tissue. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:407-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Behan FC, Rozen WM, Wilson J, Kapila S, Sizeland A, Findlay MW The cervico-submental keystone island flap for locoregional head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Behan FC, Lo CH, Sizeland A, Pham T, Findlay M Keystone island flap reconstruction of parotid defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:36e-41e.  Back to cited text no. 15
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Ravi Kumar Chittoria
Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_84_19

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Key messages:
   Introduction
   Case History
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed238    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal