|
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 14
| Issue : 1 | Page : 119-122 |
|
| Keystone flap for postburn finger flexion contracture release |
|
|
Saurabh Gupta, Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Vinayak Chavan, Abhinav Aggarwal, Chirra Likhitha Reddy, Padmalakshmi B Mohan, K Shijina, Imran Pathan
Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
| Date of Web Publication | 27-Mar-2021 |
|
|
 |
|
 Abstract | | |
Flexion contracture of finger is a major cause of disability in postburn patients. Various methods have been described to cover the resultant defect after surgical release of finger flexion contracture. Local flaps are used when there is sufficient tissue available on lateral sides of the finger to recruit into the defect. Keystone flap can be designed on volar aspect of finger to cover the post contracture release defect. Use of local flap reduces need of skin graft and donor site morbidity. Here we discuss a case of postburn finger flexion contracture release using type-3 keystone flap. Postoperative results are satisfactory. Various pros and cons of the technique are discussed. Keystone flap is a new addition to the armamentarium of plastic surgeons for release of postburn flexion contracture of fingers. Keywords: Finger flexion contracture, keystone flap, postburn contracture
How to cite this article:
Gupta S, Chittoria RK, Chavan V, Aggarwal A, Reddy CL, Mohan PB, Shijina K, Pathan I. Keystone flap for postburn finger flexion contracture release. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2021;14:119-22 |
How to cite this URL:
Gupta S, Chittoria RK, Chavan V, Aggarwal A, Reddy CL, Mohan PB, Shijina K, Pathan I. Keystone flap for postburn finger flexion contracture release. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 11];14:119-22. Available from: https://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2021/14/1/119/311843 |
| Key messages: | |  |
- Keystone flap is a new option for release of postburn flexion contracture of finger.
- It reduces skin graft requirement, thus donor site morbidity is low.
- Its utility is limited to mild contractures only.
| Introduction | | |
Postburn contracture is a major problem in developing countries.[1] Contractures are common sequela of hand burns because it is difficult for the patient to be compliant of physiotherapy and splinting regime. Flexion contracture of fingers is a cause of deformity in postburn patients.[2] Surgical release is the standard treatment for postburn flexion contractures of finger.[3] There are various methods described for coverage of resultant defect after finger contracture release.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] In case the defect is smaller it can be covered with local flaps, borrowing tissue from the adjacent (lateral) areas of finger. Most common flap described is the z-plasty transposition flap. Keystone design flap can be planned for these defects in such a way that it recruits tissue from lateral sides of finger to the defect in central part. We have used type-3 keystone design flap for coverage of defect after release of finger flexion contracture, with good post operative results.
| Case History | | |
A 17-year-old, right-hand dominant, school-going girl, came to the plastic surgery department of our hospital with postburn flexion contracture of index, middle, and ring fingers at proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint level. She had a history of accidental flame burn to the right hand 1 year back which healed with secondary intention without splinting. Now patient was admitted for surgical correction of deformity [Figure 1]. While planning the surgery, the expected defect was calculated by comparison from normal hand and it was found that there is tissue deficiency in index and middle fingers and the defect will require tissue from distant site for coverage. However, for ring finger contracture was found to be less severe and there was available tissue on lateral sides of finger to cover the defect. [Table 1] presents the calculated defect size for each finger. Staged reconstruction was planned to correct the deformity. In the first stage, index and middle finger contracture was released and the resultant defect was covered with full thickness skin graft from groin area. Then after 1 week the ring finger contracture was released and a type-3 keystone design flap was planned to cover the defect [Figure 2]. The flap markings were planned preoperatively on normal finger beforehand [Figure 3]. | Figure 1: Preoperative image of the postburn flexion contracture of right index, middle, and ring fingers
Click here to view |
 | Table 1: Preoperative measurements of expected defect size after contracture release
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: Defect of width 1.5 cm after contracture release and internal splinting with Kirschner wire. Type-3 keystone flap is planned of width 0.7 cm on each side
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Preoperative planning on normal finger (opposite hand) for contracture release using type-3 keystone flap
Click here to view |
Transverse release incision was given at the summit of the contracture. All the scar tissue was released until the finger became straight. The resultant defect was 1.5 cm wide extending up to midaxial line on both sides. For designing type-3 keystone flap the defect was imagined in two halves divided by a transverse line in the center. A curve parallel to the side of the ellipse was drawn proximal and distal to the defect taking width of the flaps same as that of the half defect (0.7 cm). Then tangents were drawn from both ends of the defect and perpendicular lines were made up to the point of intersection with the curve.[1] After marking the flap, skin and subcutaneous tissue were cut leaving the fascia over the pulley intact. Flaps were mobilized to cover the defect and two stay sutures were put. V-Y advancement was gained from both ends of the flaps. Both ends were closed in Y fashion. Two triangles of excessive tissue at the volar margin of the defect were cut and discarded from the flaps. Then the flap inset was given using HEMMing technique (horizontal everting mattress method of suturing).[1] There was a secondary defect at the proximal end of the finger, which was covered with a small full thickness skin graft from the groin area [Figure 4]. Full thickness skin graft of size 1.2 cm × 0.5 cm was required. Bolster dressing was given over the graft and light moist dressing was put on the flaps. External hand splint was applied keeping the PIP joint and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint straight. Hand elevation provided with the sling. | Figure 4: Immediate postoperative image. Note that secondary defect after flap mobilization is covered with full thickness skin graft
Click here to view |
Proximal flap had venous congestion during the first week, which got corrected by the second week. Graft was taken well. Sutures and K-wire were removed after 2 weeks. Hand therapy was started after K-wire removal. Pressure garments and silicone sheet were applied to facilitate better scar maturation. [Figure 5] shows a postoperative picture after 4 weeks of surgery.
| Discussion | | |
The Keystone Design Perforator Island Flap (KDPIF) is a curvilinear shaped trapezoidal design flap. It is named after its similarity with the keystone used to support the arch in roman constructions. Behan[6] has described and classified this flap and also popularized its application in various locations of the body. There are four types of keystone flaps described:[6]
- Type 1: Standard flap design, without cutting the deep fascia (suitable for defects up to 2 cm wide).
- Type 2A: Standard flap design with deep fascia cut along the flap margins
- a. Type 2A: Flap inset closes the defect primarily.
- b. Type 2B: secondary defect created which is covered using split thickness skin graft.
- Type 3: Double keystone flaps, designed on either side of the defect
- Type 4: Rotational keystone flap.
Keystone flap is essentially two V-Y flaps end to side.[6] For designing a keystone flap, the excision should be parallel to the vessels or the line of perforators in that region.[7] Blood vessels of finger form a ladder pattern. Digital vessels run in longitudinal fashion along the length of the finger and give multiple transverse branches which are interconnected. Based on this there are two designs of keystone flaps possible in the finger [Figure 6]. Vascular supply of keystone flap in the finger comes through the subcutaneous tissue in the base of the flap similar to the volar V-Y advancement flap [Figure 7]. | Figure 6: Arterial pattern and possible designs of keystone flap in a finger. A keystone flap should be designed parallel to the vessels or the line of perforators in that region
Click here to view |
 | Figure 7: Cross-section of finger at the level of shaft of proximal phalanx; the figure is showing depth of incision for raising keystone flap
Click here to view |
There are various modifications of the keystone design flap described and it has been used in all regions of body from head to toe.[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] We used type-3 keystone flap for reconstruction of defect after release of postburn flexion contracture of the fingers. It is the local tissue rearrangement which recruits tissue from lateral side of the finger similar to a z-plasty [Figure 8]. | Figure 8: Keystone flap is similar to two lateral V-Y flaps joined together. It recruits tissue from lateral sides and fills the defect in center
Click here to view |
Advantage of doing a flap for finger flexion contracture release is that it utilizes the local tissue and thus it reduces requirement of the skin graft. Donor site morbidity is reduced. Also there is less scar contraction with flap compared to graft and thus chances of recurrence are less with flap. Compared to z-plasty the flap tip necrosis is expected to be less with the keystone flap because entire flap is attached to the base.
Limitation of using keystone flap for finger flexion contracture release is limited advancement. Designing a keystone flap requires availability of the tissue proximal and distal to the contracture site. Also, there should be skin laxity on lateral sides of the finger to provide V-Y advancement to flap from the sides. Thus, utility of this method of reconstruction is limited to mild contractures only. In our case, we were able to close 1.5 cm wide defect with this flap and 0.5 cm wide graft. Thus effective flap mobilization was 1 cm only.
Pin cushioning type edema and venous congestion are described as expected complications of keystone flaps.[6],[7],[8],[9] Proximal flap showed venous congestion in immediate postoperative period in our case. Keystone flap produces more scarring compared to skin graft or z-plasty. In case of finger reconstruction scar hypersensitivity may be a long-term complication of this procedure. Our patient is under follow up for long-term outcomes of the procedure. This is a single case report about use of type-3 keystone flap for finger contracture release. This case report shows that use of keystone flap is suitable for this indication. A large case series is required to study its anatomical and clinical effects.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Schwarz RJ Management of postburn contractures of the upper extremity. J Burn Care Res 2007;28:212-9.  |
| 2. | Sabapathy SR, Bajantri B, Bharathi RR Management of post burn hand deformities. Indian J Plast Surg 2010;43:S72-9. |
| 3. | Grishkevich VM, Grishkevich M Postburn flexion contractures of fingers: Anatomy and treatment with trapeze-flap plasty. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Burns. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. pp. 269-85. |
| 4. | Acikel C, Peker F, Yuksel F, Ulkur E Bilateral side finger transposition flaps in the treatment of chronic postburn flexion contractures of the fingers. Ann Plast Surg 2002;49: 344-9. |
| 5. | Stekelenburg CM, Marck RE, Tuinebreijer WE, de Vet HC, Ogawa R, van Zuijlen PP A systematic review on burn scar contracture treatment: Searching for evidence. J Burn Care Res 2015;36:e153-61. |
| 6. | Behan FC The keystone design perforator island flap in reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:112-20. |
| 7. | Mohan AT, Rammos CK, Akhavan AA, Martinez J, Wu PS, Moran SL, et al. Evolving concepts of keystone perforator island flaps (KPIF): Principles of perforator anatomy, design modifications, and extended clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1909-20. |
| 8. | Pelissier P, Santoul M, Pinsolle V, Casoli V, Behan F The keystone design perforator island flap. Part I: Anatomic study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:883-7. |
| 9. | Pelissier P, Gardet H, Pinsolle V, Santoul M, Behan FC The keystone design perforator island flap. Part II: Clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:888-91. |
| 10. | Moncrieff MD, Thompson JF, Stretch JR Extended experience and modifications in the design and concepts of the keystone design island flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1359-63. |
| 11. | Khouri JS, Egeland BM, Daily SD, Harake MS, Kwon S, Neligan PC, et al. The keystone island flap: Use in large defects of the trunk and extremities in soft-tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127: 1212-21. |
| 12. | Gutman MJ, Goldschlager T, Fahardieh RD, Ying D, Xenos C, Danks RA Keystone design perforator island flap for closure of myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 2011;27:1459-63. |
| 13. | Behan F, Sizeland A, Porcedu S, Somia N, Wilson J Keystone island flap: An alternative reconstructive option to free flaps in irradiated tissue. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:407-13. |
| 14. | Behan FC, Rozen WM, Wilson J, Kapila S, Sizeland A, Findlay MW The cervico-submental keystone island flap for locoregional head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66:23-8. |
| 15. | Behan FC, Lo CH, Sizeland A, Pham T, Findlay M Keystone island flap reconstruction of parotid defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:36e-41e. |
Correspondence Address:
Ravi Kumar Chittoria
Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006.
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_84_19
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
[Table 1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 72 | | | Printed | 0 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 11 | | | Comments | [Add] | | |
|
|
