Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
CORRESPONDENCE  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 247-248
An uncommon complication of hair transplant: A crack in the "slit"


Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication18-Dec-2015
 

How to cite this article:
Mittal GS, Shivashankar S, Raj N, Nataraj HV. An uncommon complication of hair transplant: A crack in the "slit". J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2015;8:247-8

How to cite this URL:
Mittal GS, Shivashankar S, Raj N, Nataraj HV. An uncommon complication of hair transplant: A crack in the "slit". J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Jul 29];8:247-8. Available from: https://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2015/8/4/247/172210


Dear Editor,

We wish to report an uncommon complication that occurred while performing hair transplant surgery by the follicular unit transplantation (FUT) method. We routinely use stainless steel Kolkata slits [1] for making slits for dissected hair follicle units to be implanted at the recipient site. However, we recently switched over to disposable Kolkata slits that closely resemble a keratome used by an ophthalmologist. The disposable Kolkata slit is much lighter, sharper, makes narrower slits, and causes lesser scarring than the stainless steel ones. It has a plastic handle and a small stainless steel blade of 1.2 mm width. After putting about more than 500 slits, suddenly a clicking sound was heard, and it was noticed that the blade of the slit had broken and more than half of the blade was retained in the scalp tissue. Immediately, the surrounding scalp tissue was explored with a 24 g needle and a jewelers' forceps, but the retained piece could not be located. After about 20 min of futile search, a 1.5-cm incision was made and the loose areolar tissue of the involved scalp tissue was explored [Figure 1] and the broken piece of the blade was retrieved [Figure 2]. The incision was aesthetically sutured with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 suture material. The area was then camouflaged by implanting hair follicles along the suture line. The patient was informed about the complication and was reassured. On follow-up, the scar along the suture line had healed well. However, there was an area of noticeable balding along the scar. After 6 months, this scar was covered by performing a localized follicular unit extraction (FUE) and the patient is subsequently doing fine.
Figure 1: Incision made in the scalp in order to retrieve the broken piece of the blade

Click here to view
Figure 2: Broken distal piece of the blade and handle of the disposable Kolkata slit instrument

Click here to view


The possible causes for the occurrence of this mishap could be the faulty quality of the instrument and inappropriate force applied while making slits. Disposable slits are less sturdy and one must be alert about choosing instruments of good quality. We haven't experienced a similar complication in the past nor have we found it in the data published. [2] Thus, we wanted to report this to alert other hair transplant surgeons regarding the possibility of such a complication and the necessity of using high quality surgical instruments.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Kkanna M. Hair transplantation surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 2008;41(Suppl):S56-63.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Loganathan E, Sarvajnamurthy S, Gorur D, Suresh DH, Siddaraju MN, Narasimhan RT. Complications of hair restoration surgery: A retrospective analysis. Int J Trichology 2014;6:168-72.  Back to cited text no. 2
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Govind S Mittal
#33, HB Samaja Road, Basavanagudi, Bangalore - 560 004, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.172210

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1686    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded113    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal