Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
CORRESPONDENCE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 183-184
Re: Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over the face, reconstructed by V-Y plasty


Department of Plastic Surgery, BMI The Alexandra Hospital, Cheshire, United Kingdom

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication10-Dec-2014
 

How to cite this article:
Ross G. Re: Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over the face, reconstructed by V-Y plasty. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014;7:183-4

How to cite this URL:
Ross G. Re: Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over the face, reconstructed by V-Y plasty. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Sep 27];7:183-4. Available from: https://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2014/7/3/183/146688


Dear Editor,

Deshmukh et al. published a case of "Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over face, reconstructed by V-Y plasty". [1]

As the authors suggest, the VY flap is a very versatile option and is an excellent form of reconstruction on the face. [2]

This however is a complex case for both oncological excision and reconstruction, and clearly documents the difficulties encountered in surgical excision and reconstruction in this area.

The options for oncological excision include Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), surgical excision with a margin and the use of intra-operative frozen sectioning. The reconstructive options include skin grafting and local flap reconstruction as a one-stage or two-stage procedure.

For a large Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), oncological clearance is imperative prior to any reconstruction. MMS is the best method of establishing oncological clearance while minimising the subsequent defect required for reconstruction. [3] Where MMS is not available, suitable surgical oncological clearance must be confirmed prior to definitive local flap reconstruction. In the absence of MMS. this is most commonly performed using frozen sectioning examination intra-operatively.

Where surgical excision with a margin and reconstruction is required where oncological excision has not been confirmed intra-operatively. a skin graft - either split thickness or full thickness-is the best method of initial reconstruction from an oncological standpoint. This allows routine haemotoxylin and eosin assessment as used by the authors [1] to confirm oncological clearance. If oncological clearance is not achieved, a further excision can be performed easily subsequently. This is not the case when a re-excision is required with a local flap reconstruction where theoretically all the local flaps should be removed in the re-excision specimen. A local flap for a defect of this extent would not therefore be recommended as a one-stage reconstructive option without clarification of oncological clearance.

As the authors suggest, a skin graft can lead to a contour defect and is not the ideal aesthetic result. A skin graft however can be removed at a later stage using serial excision, tissue expansion or removal and replacement with a local flap, and clinicians need to be aware of all the oncological and reconstructive options available and the pros and cons of each option.

 
   References Top

1.
Deshmukh P, Sharma YK, Dogra BB, Chaudhari ND. Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over face, reconstructed by v-y plasty. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014;7:65-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
McCoubrey G, Ross GL. Subunits of the cheek: An algorithm for the reconstruction of partial-thickness defects. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:478-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Madan V. Re: Superficial large basal cell carcinoma over face, reconstructed by v-y plasty. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014;7:136-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Gary Ross
Department of Plastic Surgery, BMI The Alexandra Hospital, Cheshire
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.146688

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1271    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded68    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal