Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
COMMENTARY  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 116-117
Gynaecomastia surgery: Should it be individualised?


Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication7-Aug-2014
 

How to cite this article:
Ghnnam WM. Gynaecomastia surgery: Should it be individualised?. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014;7:116-7

How to cite this URL:
Ghnnam WM. Gynaecomastia surgery: Should it be individualised?. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jun 25];7:116-7. Available from: http://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2014/7/2/116/138356


Gynaecomastia is enlargement of male breast, and is the most common breast problem affecting men. It occurs in about 30% of middle-aged males and increases with old age due to decline in testosterone level. The first description of surgical treatment for gynaecomastia was made by Paulus Aegineta (635-690 AD), who used a semi-lunar infra mammary incision for excision of the breast tissue. Several treatments regarding gynecomastia have been described in literature, the most commonly performed procedure for Simon IIb and III stages is the combined liposuction and excision techniques. [1],[2]

In the present article the authors described a combined technique of liposuction and excess skin removal through the mammoplasty technique of depithelialisation of the skin and later suturing the skin edges to minimise scarring but they did not add any new option to the current practice of gynecomastia treatment modalities. [3]

They should have compared their technique with other more traditional excisional procedures. In my own experience a periaeriolar small incision exactly on the margin between the skin and the areola is done and all breast tissue is excised with an excellent aesthetic scar, without requiring second stage excision of excess skin.

No postoperative complications like hematoma or infection were reported by the authors in all the 10 cases. The need for reoperation was not mentioned, although literature review revealed a reoperation rate of 4-8% of gynecomastia cases for hematoma evacuation and revision. [4],[5]

The most common early complication after gynecomastia surgery is hematoma, which should be evacuated if possible. This prevents excessive scarring and distortion of the remaining breast. In liposuction cases, evacuation may not be possible. Under-resection of tissue is the most common long-term complication of gynecomastia surgery particularly in liposuction cases, when a residual mass of tissue is not removed. This can be avoided by using the pull through technique. Under-resection at the periphery of the breast can result from poor tapering and causes a noticeable deformity. Over resection in the nipple areola area can result in a saucer-type deformity that is difficult to correct. Loose skin is usually not considered a complication if it is part of the operative plan. Occasionally, loose skin occurs in an unexpected manner, and surgical excision is required. [6],[7],[8]

Surgical treatment of gynecomastia should ensure minimal scarring while respecting the aesthetic unit. The selection of the appropriate surgical method depends on the severity grade, the presence of skin redundancy and the volume of the male breast glandular tissue.


   Conclusion Top


Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for gynecomastia. Although a wide range of surgical techniques have been described, the treatment of gynecomastia requires an individualised approach. Surgeons often find it difficult to choose the technique that will achieve the best results for a given patient.

 
   References Top

1.Lapid O, Jolink F. Surgical management of gynecomastia: 20 years' experience Scand J Surg 2013;103:41-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Qutob O, Elahi B, Garimella V, Ihsan N, Drew PJ. Minimally invasive excision of gynaecomastia - a novel and effective surgical technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92:198-200.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Role of combined ccircumareolar skin excision and liposuction in the management of high grade gynecomastia. J Cutan Aesth Surg 2014;7:112-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP Jr. Classification and management of gynecomastia: Defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:909-23.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Hammond DC. Surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124 (Suppl): 61-8e.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Bracaglia R, Fortunato R, Gentileschi S, Seccia A, Farallo E. Our experience with the so called pull-through technique combined with liposuction for management of gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:22-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Lista F, Ahmad J. Power-assisted liposuction and the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:740-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Handschin AE, Bietry D, Husler R, Banic A, Constantinescu M. Surgical management of gynecomastia - a 10-year analysis. World J Surg 2008;32:38-44.  Back to cited text no. 8
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Wagih Mommtaz Ghnnam
14 Gawad Hosney Street, Sherbin, Dakahlia
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 25136215

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   Conclusion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1058    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded97    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal