Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
LETTER  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 160-161
Author's reply


Department of Dermatology and STD, VM Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication17-Sep-2011
 

How to cite this article:
Bhardwaj D, Khunger N. Author's reply. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2011;4:160-1

How to cite this URL:
Bhardwaj D, Khunger N. Author's reply. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Jun 25];4:160-1. Available from: http://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2011/4/2/160/85053


Sir,

We appreciate the interest shown in our article. [1] The scars were evaluated using the method of scar counting as already mentioned in the text. The ice pick scars were counted before treatment and recounted after treatment. The Leeds scoring pattern is a numerical count of scars translated into scores. [2] The ECCA system is also a numerical scoring system and takes into account all the types of scars. [3] The Global Acne Scarring Classification is a qualitative and subjective method and takes into account all types of scars. [4] This was not required in our case since we focussed only on the ice pick scars. We did a numerical scoring before and after treatment and translated it into a quartile system. As shown in [Table 1], a reduction in scar count of >70% was excellent and a reduction in scar count between 50 and 70% was good. The assessment results of the improvement in the number of scars did not change at the end of the study period at 6 months. The table is representative of the study period. In one patient, there was reduced improvement in the subjective depth of the scars, which is mentioned in the paper. The patient who developed transient postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was Fitzpatrick type IV and improvement was in the 50-70% group.
Figure 1: Excellent improvement 3 months after the last treatment

Click here to view


[Figure 2] and [Figure 3] are of different patients. [1] A figure with pre and post-treatment was submitted [Figure 1]. In the final publication, the post-treatment figure was inadvertently edited.

 
   References Top

1.Bhardwaj D, Khunger N. An assessment of the efficacy and safety of CROSS technique with 100% TCA in the management of ice pick acne scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2010;3:93-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exper Dermatol 1994;19:303-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Dreno B, Khammari A, Orain N, Noray C, Mérial-Kieny C, Méry S, et al. ECCA grading scale: An original validated acne scar grading scale for clinical practice in dermatology. Dermatology 2007;214:46-51.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Goodman GJ, Baron JA. Postacne scarring: A qualitative global scarring grading system. Dermatol Surg 2006;32:1458-66.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Niti Khunger
Department of Dermatology and STD, VM Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21976919

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1590    
    Printed66    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded76    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal