Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
   Table of Contents     
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 141-143
Massive abdominal wall endometriosis masquerading as desmoid tumour


Department of Pathology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Narhe, Pune, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication17-Sep-2011
 

   Abstract 

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition that usually presents as an abdominal lump. It can be a diagnostic dilemma and should be considered as a differential diagnosis for lumps in the abdomen in females. We discuss a case of abdominal wall endometriosis following caesarean section, which was misdiagnosed as a desmoid tumour.

Keywords: Abdominal wall, endometriosis, desmoid tumor

How to cite this article:
Anand M, Deshmukh SD. Massive abdominal wall endometriosis masquerading as desmoid tumour. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2011;4:141-3

How to cite this URL:
Anand M, Deshmukh SD. Massive abdominal wall endometriosis masquerading as desmoid tumour. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Aug 23];4:141-3. Available from: http://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2011/4/2/141/85043



   Introduction Top


Endometriosis is defined as functioning endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It occurs in up to 15% of menstruating women. [1] Endometriosis occurs most frequently in the pelvis. Extrapelvic endometriosis is less common. It can occur in every organ of the body, including the gall bladder, gastrointestinal tract, skin, appendix, kidney, and lung. Hernial sacs, abdominal wall, and surgical scars also are sites of involvement. [2]

Caesarean section endometriosis is a rare event, with an incidence of 0.03-0.47%. [3] We, hereby, report a case of endometriosis in a caesarean section scar, which was initially misdiagnosed as a desmoid tumour.


   Case Report Top


A 30-year-old woman presented with a gradually increasing painful abdominal lump for the past six years. The pain was not associated with menstruation. Seven years back, she had undergone caesarean section for cephalo-pelvic disproportion. Physical examination revealed a 12 × 10 cm tender firm midline abdominal lump. The overlying skin was discoloured, with a dark brown scar. Ultrasound revealed a large firm mass lesion in the lower anterior abdominal wall in the midline extending up to the pubic region and showing hypoechoic and isoechoic components. CT scan revealed a 10 × 8 × 5 cm ill-defined heterogeneous soft tissue density mass lesion in the anterior abdominal wall, infraumbilical region predominantly epicentred at the right rectus abdominis muscle with extensions into opposite rectus muscle, skin, and subcutaneous tissue [Figure 1]. Based on the clinical and radiological findings, a desmoid tumour was considered. The mass was excised and sent for histopathological examination.
Figure 1: CT scan revealing a 10 × 8 × 5 cm ill-defined heterogeneous soft tissue density mass lesion in the anterior abdominal wall involving rectus abdominis muscle, skin, and subcutaneous tissue (arrows)

Click here to view


Grossly, the specimen measured 13.2 × 12.3 × 5.5 cm. It was a soft tissue mass covered with skin, along with a part of the rectus muscle. The skin surface showed scarring [Figure 2]. On the cut section, multiple cystic spaces filled with haemorrhagic fluid were evident [Figure 3]. Microscopy revealed islands of endometrial tissue embedded in abundant collagen-rich desmoplastic stroma. Few of the endometrial glands were cystically dilated and filled with haemorrhagic fluid. The endometrial glands and stroma were seen infiltrating into the abdominal musculature and adipose tissue. Foci of haemorrhage and chronic inflammatory infiltrate were also seen [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. Based on the above findings, a diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) was made.
Figure 2: Gross appearance of the abdominal mass covered with skin

Click here to view
Figure 3: Cut section of the specimen showing multiple cystic spaces (arrows), along fibro-fatty tissue

Click here to view
Figure 4: Microscopy revealing endometrial tissue (arrows) embedded in abundant desmoplastic stroma (arrow heads) (H and E, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 5: Photomicrograph revealing endometrial tissue (arrows), adjacent abdominal fat (arrow heads), and chronic inflammatory infiltrate (asterix) (H and E, ×100)

Click here to view


Following wide local excision, the patient was administered danazol 100 mg twice daily for initial six months. After nine months of follow-up, the patient is doing well and is symptom free.


   Discussion Top


Endometriosis is characterised by the presence of histologically normal endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, usually the pelvis. The most common extrapelvic location of endometriosis is the abdominal wall, particularly surgical scars related to gynaecologic or obstetric surgery. [4] The incidence following hysterectomy is 1.08-2%, whereas after Caesarean section, the incidence is 0.03-0.4%. [5] AWE has also been reported after amniocentesis, hypertonic saline solution abortion, and laparoscopy. [4] An occasional case of AWE in the absence of previous surgery has also been reported. [2]

Various theories have been proposed for endometriosis: [6]

  • Retrograde spread of collections of endometrial cells during menstruation
  • Blood, lymphatic, or iatrogenic spread
  • Metaplasia of the pelvic peritoneal cells
  • Immune system dysfunction and autoantibody formation
Scar endometriosis is believed to be the result of direct inoculation of the abdominal fascia or subcutaneous tissue with endometrial cells during surgical intervention and subsequent stimulation by estrogen. [6] In different series, the time interval between operation and presentation has been shown to vary from three months to seven years. [5]

The characteristic clinical symptom of AWE is cyclic pain associated with menstruation. The non-cyclic nature of pain has occasionally been reported, which may explain why it is clinically often misdiagnosed as in the present case. Most patients also present with a palpable mass at the site of maximum tenderness in the region of the surgical scar. [7]

On sonography, these lesions appear hypoechoic, vascular, or solid, with some cystic changes. CT usually shows a solid, well circumscribed mass. The radiological findings are non-specific and a wide spectrum of disorders presenting as a mass should be considered in the imaging differential diagnosis. These include neoplasms such as sarcoma, desmoid tumour, lymphoma, or metastasis, as well as non-neoplastic causes such as a suture granulomas, ventral hernia, haematoma, or abscess. [8],[9] Histopathological examination is required for the final diagnosis of AWE.

Malignant changes in endometriosis in a Caesarean scar are rarely seen. Clear cell carcinoma is the most common histological subtype, followed by endometrioid carcinoma. [10]

Therapeutic options for AWE are pharmacologic therapy with hormonal agents such as progestogens, oral contraceptive pills, and danazol; or it may be surgical excision. The success rate of medical therapy has been reported to be low, offering only temporary alleviation of symptoms often followed by recurrence after cessation of the drug. Moreover, due to side effects such as amenorrhoea, weight gain, hirsutism, and acne, compliance is unlikely. Wide surgical excision, therefore, is the treatment of choice. Mesh replacement may also be done along with this. [7]

To conclude, AWE is difficult to diagnose clinically and radiologically. A high index of suspicion is recommended when a woman presents with postoperative painful abdominal lump.

 
   References Top

1.Patterson GK, Winburn GB. Abdominal wall endometriomas: report of eight cases. Am Surg 1999;65:36-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Tomas E, Martin A, Garfia C, Gomez FS, Morillas JG, Tortajada GC, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis in absence of previous surgery. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:373-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Chen YH, Kay N. Abdominal wall endometriomas. J Reprod Med 2009;54:155-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Khaleghian R. Abdominal wall endometriosis: Sonographic diagnosis. Australas Radiol 1995;39:166-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Celik M, Bulbuloglu E, Buyukbese MA, Cetinkaya A. Abdominal wall endometrioma: localizing in rectus abdominis sheath. Turk J Med Sci 2004;34:341-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Seydel AS, Sickel JZ, Warner ED, Sax HC. Extrapelvic endometriosis: Diagnosis and treatment. Am J Surg 1996;171:239-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Hensen JJ, Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB. Abdominal wall endometriosis: Clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:616-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP. Endometriosis: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2001;21:193-216.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Wolf C, Obrist P, Ensinger C. Sonographic features of abdominal wall endometriosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:916-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Leng J, Lang J, Guo L, Li H, Liu Z. Carcinosarcoma arisisng from atypical endometriosis in a cesarean scar. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 2006;16:432-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Mani Anand
Department of Pathology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Narhe, Off Pune-Mumbai Bypass, Pune - 411 041, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.85043

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]

This article has been cited by
1 Diagnostic value of susceptibility-weighted imaging of abdominal wall endometriomas during the cyclic menstrual changes: A preliminary study
Aynur Solak,Neslin Sahin,Berhan GenÁ,Ali Riza Sever,Mine GenÁ,Oya Nermin Sivrikoz
European Journal of Radiology. 2013; 82(9): e411
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Endometriosis of Abdominal and Pelvic Wall Scars: Multimodality Imaging Findings, Pathologic Correlation, and Radiologic Mimics
Rita Gidwaney,Ruth L. Badler,Benjamin L. Yam,John J. Hines,Vlada Alexeeva,Virginia Donovan,Douglas S. Katz
RadioGraphics. 2012; 32(7): 2031
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7049    
    Printed136    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded141    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal