Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Print this page
Email this page
Small font size
Default font size
Increase font size
Home About us Current issue Archives Instructions Submission Subscribe Editorial Board Partners Contact e-Alerts Login 


 
QUIZ Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 122-124
A case of papillary growth from the areola


1 Department of Surgery, Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, India
2 Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, India
3 Department of Surgery, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication4-Sep-2010
 

How to cite this article:
Mathur AV, Kudesia S, Anand M, Singh M. A case of papillary growth from the areola. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2010;3:122-4

How to cite this URL:
Mathur AV, Kudesia S, Anand M, Singh M. A case of papillary growth from the areola. J Cutan Aesthet Surg [serial online] 2010 [cited 2017 Apr 23];3:122-4. Available from: http://www.jcasonline.com/text.asp?2010/3/2/122/69028


A 40-year-old female patient presented to the surgical clinic with complaints of a unilateral papillary growth arising from the areola since 30 years. There were no complaints of changes in size during pregnancy or lactation. General physical examination was unremarkable. Local examination showed a 1 cm Χ 1 cm pedunculated warty growth covered by skin, with a narrow stalk [Figure 1]. The lump was excised under local anaesthesia with a clinical diagnosis of papilloma. Histopathology is shown in [Figure 2].
Figure 1 :A papillary growth from areola with a narrow stalk

Click here to view
Figure 2 :Histology of the papillary growth reveals ducts in dermis with normal overlying epidermis

Click here to view


What is your diagnosis?


   Diagnosis:Accessory Nipple Top


Histopathology showed ducts within stroma, confirming the diagnosis of accessory nipple. Supernumerary nipples (SNs), or polythelia, are located along the embryonic milk line. Ectopic SNs are found beyond the embryonic milk line. [1] SNs can appear complete with breast tissue and ducts, and are then referred to as polymastia, or they can appear partially with either of the tissues involved.

Nipple dichotomy, or intraareolar polythelia, involves one or more SNs within the same areola. These are very rare malformations. Their significance lies in their use for the reconstruction of a nipple defect resulting from surgery, e.g., a central quadrantectomy. [2]

They result from failure of regression of the ectodermal streaks formed along the primitive mammary line. Hence, they are located along the milk line, although ectopic nipples have been reported from as far as the toes.

The first SN was reported as early as in 1878. The incidence is reported at 0.2%. [3] There is a male preponderance, with a male to female ratio of as high as 1.7:1. In the last two decades, there has been renewed interest in SNs because of the dilemma of the possible associated malformations.


   Associated Abnormalities Top


SN has been described in a number of syndromes but, in most cases, they are probably a chance finding. These syndromes include Turner syndrome, Fanconi anaemia, haematologic disorders [4] and ectodermal dysplasia.

Other associations of SNs include the following;

Central nervous system anomalies like aneurysms, epilepsy, migraine, neurosis and neural tube defects, gastrointestinal anomalies like acid pepsin disease and pyloric stenosis, skeletal malformations of the hand, vertebra, coronal suture synostosis and rib absence, cardiac anomalies like bundle branch block, conduction anomalies and Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and renal anomalies.

There have been many studies to study the relationship between SN and these abnormalities, but none have been able to demonstrate a statistically significant association. Herein lies a medicolegal pitfall, and the possibility of litigation if such anomalies are not excluded, and, present later on, cannot be ignored.


   Clinical Features Top


Clinically, they are often asymptomatic, or they may present with pain and swelling, associated with adolescence, pregnancy or menstruation. On examination, they are seen as small pigmented spots or as umbilicated nodules. They may be hidden by the normal breast. In the new born, for the detection of SN, it is useful to press a wet gauze pad along the milk line, from the axilla to the thigh. When present, they are seen as concave areas of wrinkling. The ectopic sites are in the perineum, face, neck, shoulder and even the limbs!

Familial cases with autosomal-dominant transmission with incomplete expression are also known to run in a family. [5]


   Classification Top


They were classified on the basis of the presence of glandular tissue, nipple, areola, fat and hair, by Kajava in 1915, as follows: [6]

Type I: Glandular tissue with nipple, areola and fat

Type II: Glandular tissue with nipple, no areola

Type III: Glandular tissue with areola, no nipple

Type IV: Glandular tissue only

Type V: Pseudomamma - nipple, areola present, no glandular tissue

Type VI: Polythelia - only nipple present

Type VII: Polythelia areolaris - only areola present

Type VIII: Polythelia pilosa - hair patch present

Our case of intraareolar polythelia had ductal tissue, stroma and skin, evident only on histology, whereas on gross examination, only a papillary growth from the nipple was evident. Hence, it is distinct from Kajava's classification.


   Differential Diagnosis Top


They need to be differentiated from pigmented naevi, neurofibroma, dermatofibroma, hidradenitis supppurativa, lipoma and other skin tags. However, atypical cases like the one presented above may only be diagnosed on histology findings of areolar tubercles, smooth muscle of the areola, mammary glands and intradermal ducts. [7] SN may be a precursor of extra-mammary Paget's disease [8]


   Clinical Clue to Diagnosis Top


Clinically, the presence of wrinkling on folding between the fingers or the presence of a cleft-like appearance in the centre should make one suspect the condition. On dermoscopy, these lesions show central white scar-like areas with peripheral fine pigmentation.


   Treatment Top


Treatment objectives should be:

  1. To establish the diagnosis and offer cosmetic improvement if required. Some patients with small flat nipples may need only follow-up. Others with protuberant erectile growths may need simple surgical excision. Removal using liquid nitrogen has been described. [9] The tumescent liposuction is another technique that offers more cosmetic results. [10]
  2. Work-up to rule out an associated congenital malformation. Renal abnormalities are the most common and should be excluded by means of ultrasonography. However, on review of the literature, although there are conflicting results in various series, the relationship has not been conclusively established.
  3. Exclusion of pathology in the SN itself or the associated malformation. Fine needle aspiration cytology, mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be performed to rule out secondary changes. Women with a family history of breast cancer may merit excision of the nipple along with any associated breast tissue.


 
   References Top

1.Conde DM, Kashimoto E, Torresan RZ, Alvarenga M. Pseudomamma on the foot: An unusual presentation of supernumerary breast tissue. Dermatol Online J 2006;12:7.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Magno S, Terribile D, Franceschini G, Fabbri C, Chiesa F, Di Leone A, et al. Accessory nipple reconstruction following a central quadrantectomy: A case report. Cases J 2009;2:32.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Leichtenstern D. About the occurrence and importance of supernumerary (accessory) breasts and nipples. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med 1878;73:222.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Aslan D, Gόrsel T, Kaya Z. Supernumerary nipples in children with hematologic disorders. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004;21:461-3.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Toumbis-Ioannou E, Cohen PR. Familial polythelia. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:667-8.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]    
6.Revis, Don R Jr. Breast embryology. Available from: http://www.eMedicine.com . [last retrieved on 2007 Dec 3].  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Shewmake SW, Izuno GT. Supernumerary areolae. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:823-5.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Willman JH, Golitz LE, Fitzpatrick JE. Clear cells of Toker in accessory nipples. J Cutan Pathol 2003;30:256-60.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Sladden MJ, Sladden JA. A novel treatment for accessory nipples. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:405.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Fan J. Removal of accessory breasts: A novel tumescent liposuction approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009. In press.  Back to cited text no. 10      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Alok Vardhan Mathur
Department of Surgery, Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand - 248 001
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.69028

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Diagnosis:Access...
    Associated Abnor...
    Clinical Features
    Classification
    Differential Dia...
    Clinical Clue to...
    Treatment
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed10064    
    Printed133    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded135    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal